and revised through collaboration of administration and Faculty Senate. The form and any revisions to the form shall be approved through Faculty Senate. b. A rubric shall be used to assess faculty performance so that consistency across divisions and units is maintained. The rubric shall be developed and revised through collaboration of administration and Faculty Senate. The rubric and any revisions to it shall be approved through Faculty Senate. c. The evaluator shall use the contents of the annual self-evaluation, student evaluations, classroom observation(s) where applicable, and elements of the faculty member’s annual plan to designate an overall rating for the faculty member under the section “Performance Rating Achieved.” This rating shall consider carefully, the rating the faculty member claimed on their SelfEvaluation. Any difference in rating shall be justified on the form. d. The evaluator shall provide for a confidential process by which the faculty member can review their annual evaluation once it is completed and signed. e. No unsatisfactory evaluation of a faculty member by the evaluator shall be permitted after the end of contract days. Any academic faculty member may request and receive their evaluation before the end of the faculty annual contract. f. Either the faculty member or the evaluator may schedule a meeting between the two parties to review the contents of the evaluation. The faculty member will review the annual report and attach their signature indicating they have read the annual evaluation. g. The Dean is the final evaluator of academic instructional faculty in Academic Divisions. A supervisor designated by TMCC is the final evaluator for academic 2022-2025 TMCC-NFA Contract Article 12 Page 78
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy ODQ3NA==