meeting the objectives. A copy of the Faculty Support Committee’s report shall be made available to the faculty member under review. The evaluator shall prepare the faculty member’s evaluation, taking into account the report of the Faculty Support Committee. 12.4 Concerns Regarding Tenure-Track Faculty Performance Annual self-evaluations of tenure-track faculty shall utilize the same process (Article 12.1) as for tenured faculty. Performance evaluations for tenure-track faculty shall include thorough communication and documentation between the candidate, the Tenure Probationary Committee, the Department Chair/APC/APD/Director, and the evaluator. 1. Should the Tenure Probationary Committee, the Department Chair/Director/Program Coordinator, or the evaluator have concerns about the performance of a tenure-track candidate, including an unsatisfactory evaluation, the process shall include, but is not limited to, the following procedures: a. Concerns shall be documented, and the Tenure Probationary Committee Chair and the tenure track candidate shall be notified in writing in a timely and appropriate manner. b. The Tenure Probationary Committee shall meet to discuss the concerns, and to review supporting documentation. c A proposed plan and timeline to remedy the concerns shall be drafted by the Tenure Probationary Committee Chair and discussed with the Tenure Probationary Committee and the candidate. d. Progress in the form of measurable benchmarks towards remedying the concerns shall be documented by the tenure-track candidate. This documentation shall be 2022-2025 TMCC-NFA Contract Article 12 Page 81
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy ODQ3NA==