Article 12 Faculty Evaluation Process Faculty evaluation is a holistic process Academic faculty evaluations involve a balance between the faculty member’s annual plan, the self-evaluation of the annual plan, classroom observations, student evaluations and the supervisor’s evaluation of the faculty member’s performance. Administrative faculty evaluations involve a balance between goal-setting, fulfillment of position responsibilities, and measurable achievements. Both processes consist of a written assessment and an assignment of an overall rating. Each faculty member and HR will receive copies of the evaluator’s written evaluation when the process is complete. 12.1 Academic Faculty Evaluation Process This provision is effective starting with the academic year 2023-2024. The Evaluation process consists of three steps: 1. Academic Faculty Annual Plan. The annual plan describes the faculty member’s professional goals and intentions for the academic year and can include activities completed after the evaluation process of the previous year. Annual Plans are completed on the “Annual Plan” Form available on the Faculty Senate Website and are due no later than thirty (30) working days from the first contract day of the Fall Semester. a. Annual plans should reflect each faculty member’s goals by addressing teaching/counseling/librarianship (as applicable), professional development, and service (institutional, discipline, and/or community). b. The faculty member is solely responsible for choosing activities for their annual plan from the Faculty Evaluation Criteria. 2022-2025 TMCC-NFA Contract Article 12 Page 76
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy ODQ3NA==